Follow the Evidence Wherever It Leads. Says Who?
Naturalism can describe what you believe. It cannot tell you what you owe. It is the line that ends the […]
Naturalism can describe what you believe. It cannot tell you what you owe. It is the line that ends the […]
Apologetics · Creation and Science — Intelligent Design “Intelligent design isn’t science.” That sentence ends more conversations than any argument
Pure mathematics invented centuries early keeps turning out to be what the cosmos was running on all along. Naturalism can admit the fact. It cannot make it unsurprising.
“I’m not claiming anything. I just lack a belief. The burden is yours.” You have heard it, and it usually
Ink on a page is just ink. So how did that sentence come to be about your mother? Pick up
The tautology charge against Darwinism fails, and Christians should stop using it. The sharper version of that objection survives scrutiny — here is how to ask it.
Apologetics · Answering the New Atheism You lay out the case as carefully as you know how. The universe had
What materialism cannot say about the man who did it There is a fact about your body that sounds like
The Waiting-Time Problem and the Limits of Deep Time Every conversation about origins eventually reaches the same move. You raise
Apologetics · Creation — Intelligent Design and the origin of life Most debates about origins start in the wrong place.
If you had been born in Karachi you would be a Muslim. It is the most popular objection of the moment — and it dissolves the skeptic’s position just as fast as yours.
“You already disbelieve in thousands of gods. I just go one god further.” It sounds devastating. It is a category
Science runs on numbers, and numbers are not made of matter. Materialism has no shelf for the one instrument it cannot work without.
Apologetics — answering the New Atheism It is the most quoted line in the whole movement, and it fits on
Science can describe every neuron that fires when you see red. It still cannot say why there is anyone home
The New Atheists are loudest about the problem of evil — and their own worldview is the one place evil
If the mind is only atoms obeying physics, why trust its conclusions — including naturalism itself? The argument from reason shows why a rational mind needs a rational Maker.
“I do not need God to be a good person.” Of course you can behave well without God. But that was never the real question. The real one is where “well” comes from at all — and matter in motion cannot sign the moral law written on every heart.
The New Atheism’s most quotable charge deserves a straight answer — and the Bible agrees with more of it than
If everything is particles obeying physics, then no one has ever chosen anything — and every courtroom, apology, and repentance becomes theater. Yet no one can live that way.