They Offered You Two Doors. Both of Them Are Wrong.
A question Socrates asked 2,400 years ago is still the sharpest thing the New Atheists have. It deserves a real […]
A question Socrates asked 2,400 years ago is still the sharpest thing the New Atheists have. It deserves a real […]
Naturalism can describe what you believe. It cannot tell you what you owe. It is the line that ends the
Apologetics · Creation and Science — Intelligent Design “Intelligent design isn’t science.” That sentence ends more conversations than any argument
“I’m not claiming anything. I just lack a belief. The burden is yours.” You have heard it, and it usually
Apologetics · Answering the New Atheism You lay out the case as carefully as you know how. The universe had
Rock layers do not carry timestamps. Before anyone dates a canyon wall, somebody has to decide what kind of past made it — and 2 Peter names the assumption.
If you had been born in Karachi you would be a Muslim. It is the most popular objection of the moment — and it dissolves the skeptic’s position just as fast as yours.
“You already disbelieve in thousands of gods. I just go one god further.” It sounds devastating. It is a category
Science runs on numbers, and numbers are not made of matter. Materialism has no shelf for the one instrument it cannot work without.
Genesis does not describe God sculpting. Ten times it says He spoke. Order came before matter — and that claim is the hardest one for naturalism to answer.
Apologetics — answering the New Atheism It is the most quoted line in the whole movement, and it fits on
Science can describe every neuron that fires when you see red. It still cannot say why there is anyone home
The New Atheists are loudest about the problem of evil — and their own worldview is the one place evil
If the mind is only atoms obeying physics, why trust its conclusions — including naturalism itself? The argument from reason shows why a rational mind needs a rational Maker.
Every experiment assumes the universe will behave tomorrow the way it behaved today. Naturalism uses that assumption every waking hour
In our era, authority has become a battlefield. Where it once rested in the divine, now it is claimed by numbers, expertise, and urgency. The erosion of trust reveals a truth: authority no longer commands respect. Instead, it must be fought for, defended, and branded. This shift heralds the rise of power, transforming conversations into contests over dominance. To grasp the current state of authority, we must delve deeper into its essence and the forces reshaping it.
Delve into the heart of creationist debates with this exploration of presuppositions that redefine the Bible’s authority over scientific claims. Uncover the contrasting worldviews that drive Young-Earth and Old-Earth Creationism.