One God Further: Why Disbelieving Zeus Is Not the Same as Disbelieving God
“You already disbelieve in thousands of gods. I just go one god further.” It sounds devastating. It is a category […]
“You already disbelieve in thousands of gods. I just go one god further.” It sounds devastating. It is a category […]
Science runs on numbers, and numbers are not made of matter. Materialism has no shelf for the one instrument it cannot work without.
God guided evolution. Two words carry the whole peace treaty, and one of them has never been cashed out. There are only three things it can mean, and each costs something.
The fossil record’s loudest signal is not change. It is the absence of it. Darwin knew where his theory was
Apologetics · Creation — Reading Genesis 1 With the Text in Front of You Two men sit in the same
The young-earth case does not rest on rock layers. It rests on two genealogies that attach numbers to names. The best objections stated at full strength, the reply that turns on arithmetic, and what the list is actually for.
Stated at full strength it is a charge against the character of God, not the plan of salvation. What Scripture actually says about general revelation, conscience, assigned geography, and the seeker God moves continents to reach.
Ninety-eight percent of your DNA was written off as leftover debris. Forty years of looking has revised that number in exactly one direction.
Genesis does not describe God sculpting. Ten times it says He spoke. Order came before matter — and that claim is the hardest one for naturalism to answer.
Apologetics — answering the New Atheism It is the most quoted line in the whole movement, and it fits on
Science can describe every neuron that fires when you see red. It still cannot say why there is anyone home
The usual frame is science against Scripture. The harder question is whose reading of Genesis you are overruling. Theistic evolution
Apologetics · Creation — The branching tree in the textbook does more persuading than any experiment ever has. It is
Apologetics — “A committee of men decided what went in the Bible.” It is the most confident objection in the
An in-house question, handled honestly on both sides Every position has one question it would rather not be asked. For
Nobody has ever measured the age of a rock. We measure something else and then reason backward. Say “4.5 billion
Forensics, archaeology, cryptography, SETI — all run on design detection. Apply the same inference to a living cell and suddenly the question itself is ruled out of bounds.
Creation ex nihilo and the question underneath every other question: why is there a you at all? There are two
The New Atheists are loudest about the problem of evil — and their own worldview is the one place evil
If the mind is only atoms obeying physics, why trust its conclusions — including naturalism itself? The argument from reason shows why a rational mind needs a rational Maker.