
William Lane Craig — Apologetics CV / Résumé
Snapshot
- American analytic philosopher, theologian, Christian apologist. (Wikipedia)
- Visiting/Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology (Biola University) in La Mirada, CA. (Biola University)
- Founder of the ministry Reasonable Faith (apologetics organization). (Wikipedia)
Academic Credentials
- B.A., Communications (High Honors) from Wheaton College, Illinois, 1971. (Reasonable Faith)
- M.A., Philosophy of Religion, summa cum laude, from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (1974-75) – also M.A. Church History (summa) in same institution. (Reasonable Faith)
- Ph.D., Philosophy, University of Birmingham (England), 1977. (Wikipedia)
- D.Theol. (Doctorate in Theology), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (Munich), Germany, 1984. (Wikipedia)
- Post-doctoral research fellowship: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Germany). (Reasonable Faith)
- Visiting research roles: e.g., University of Louvain (Belgium) 1987-94. (Reasonable Faith)
Apologetics Credentials & Public Engagement
- Has authored/edited 30+ books and hundreds of articles in philosophy of religion and theology. (Reasonable Faith)
- Frequent lecturer at major universities and forums: Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, Oxford, Cambridge, Moscow, Peking, etc. (Reasonable Faith)
- Highly active in formal debates with prominent atheists/new-atheists and philosophers (e.g., debates over existence of God, resurrection of Jesus, etc.). (RationalWiki)
- Founder of Reasonable Faith ministry, which supplies video/audio lectures, publications, debate transcripts. (Reasonable Faith)
- Served/present in philosophical societies: e.g., President of the Evangelical Philosophical Society; President of the Philosophy of Time Society (1999-2006) according to wiki. (Wikipedia)
Major Books (Selected)
- The Kalam Cosmological Argument (1979) – foundational work on the kalam argument. (johnmichaelwiley.wordpress.com)
- Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics (1st ed. 1994; later eds). (Wikipedia)
- Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus (1985). (Wikipedia)
- God, Time and Eternity (2001). (johnmichaelwiley.wordpress.com)
- On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision (2010). (The C.S. Lewis Study Group)
- Creation Out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration (with Paul Copan) (2004). (johnmichaelwiley.wordpress.com)
(Note: This is a partial list — his full bibliography is extensive.)
Key Debates / Interviews (Selected)
- Debate with Christopher Hitchens (2009) “Does God Exist?” at Biola. (Reasonable Faith)
- Debate with Lawrence Krauss (2013) “Life, the Universe & Nothing?” (scientific atheism vs Christian apologetics). (RationalWiki)
- Dialogue with Sean Carroll (2014) “God and Cosmology”. (RationalWiki)
- Numerous recorded lectures and series via Reasonable Faith including “Does God Exist?”, “Is Time Travel Possible?”, “The Resurrection of Jesus”, etc. (Reasonable Faith)
Strengths (Analytical Assessment)
- High academic credibility: Two doctorates in philosophy and theology, membership in major academic circles, significant publication record.
- Debate-ready & prolific: Regular public engagements and debates give him a strong public profile and accessibility to both specialist and general audiences.
- Strong specialty areas: Especially philosophy of religion (arguments for God’s existence), philosophy of time, historicity of the resurrection; thus offering depth in key apologetics topics.
- Bridging academic & popular: He writes for both scholarly journals and popular Christian audience, which means his material can serve multiple purposes (sermon prep, academic study, lay reading).
Weaknesses / Critiques (Fair Read)
- Reception in academic philosophy: While highly cited in philosophy of religion, some critics say his work doesn’t always engage the full depth of current metaphysical or epistemological debate (especially compared to specialist secular metaphysicians).
- Heavy on formal argumentation: Some find his style more analytic/logical than narrative or pastoral; for some church-audiences this may feel abstract.
- Polarizing among skeptics: As seen in rationalist/atheist critiques (e.g., via RationalWiki) he is often targeted for alleged oversimplifications of opponents’ positions. (RationalWiki)
- Scope of expertise: While very strong in certain domains (cosmology, resurrection, time), he may less often engage adjacent fields in apologetics (e.g., detailed biblical-textual criticism, social science of religion) in the public-facing materials.
