William Lane Craig — Apologetics CV / Résumé


William Lane Craig — Apologetics CV / Résumé

Snapshot

  • American analytic philosopher, theologian, Christian apologist. (Wikipedia)
  • Visiting/Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology (Biola University) in La Mirada, CA. (Biola University)
  • Founder of the ministry Reasonable Faith (apologetics organization). (Wikipedia)

Academic Credentials

  • B.A., Communications (High Honors) from Wheaton College, Illinois, 1971. (Reasonable Faith)
  • M.A., Philosophy of Religion, summa cum laude, from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (1974-75) – also M.A. Church History (summa) in same institution. (Reasonable Faith)
  • Ph.D., Philosophy, University of Birmingham (England), 1977. (Wikipedia)
  • D.Theol. (Doctorate in Theology), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (Munich), Germany, 1984. (Wikipedia)
  • Post-doctoral research fellowship: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Germany). (Reasonable Faith)
  • Visiting research roles: e.g., University of Louvain (Belgium) 1987-94. (Reasonable Faith)

Apologetics Credentials & Public Engagement

  • Has authored/edited 30+ books and hundreds of articles in philosophy of religion and theology. (Reasonable Faith)
  • Frequent lecturer at major universities and forums: Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, Oxford, Cambridge, Moscow, Peking, etc. (Reasonable Faith)
  • Highly active in formal debates with prominent atheists/new-atheists and philosophers (e.g., debates over existence of God, resurrection of Jesus, etc.). (RationalWiki)
  • Founder of Reasonable Faith ministry, which supplies video/audio lectures, publications, debate transcripts. (Reasonable Faith)
  • Served/present in philosophical societies: e.g., President of the Evangelical Philosophical Society; President of the Philosophy of Time Society (1999-2006) according to wiki. (Wikipedia)

Major Books (Selected)

  • The Kalam Cosmological Argument (1979) – foundational work on the kalam argument. (johnmichaelwiley.wordpress.com)
  • Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics (1st ed. 1994; later eds). (Wikipedia)
  • Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus (1985). (Wikipedia)
  • God, Time and Eternity (2001). (johnmichaelwiley.wordpress.com)
  • On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision (2010). (The C.S. Lewis Study Group)
  • Creation Out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration (with Paul Copan) (2004). (johnmichaelwiley.wordpress.com)
    (Note: This is a partial list — his full bibliography is extensive.)

Key Debates / Interviews (Selected)

  • Debate with Christopher Hitchens (2009) “Does God Exist?” at Biola. (Reasonable Faith)
  • Debate with Lawrence Krauss (2013) “Life, the Universe & Nothing?” (scientific atheism vs Christian apologetics). (RationalWiki)
  • Dialogue with Sean Carroll (2014) “God and Cosmology”. (RationalWiki)
  • Numerous recorded lectures and series via Reasonable Faith including “Does God Exist?”, “Is Time Travel Possible?”, “The Resurrection of Jesus”, etc. (Reasonable Faith)

Strengths (Analytical Assessment)

  • High academic credibility: Two doctorates in philosophy and theology, membership in major academic circles, significant publication record.
  • Debate-ready & prolific: Regular public engagements and debates give him a strong public profile and accessibility to both specialist and general audiences.
  • Strong specialty areas: Especially philosophy of religion (arguments for God’s existence), philosophy of time, historicity of the resurrection; thus offering depth in key apologetics topics.
  • Bridging academic & popular: He writes for both scholarly journals and popular Christian audience, which means his material can serve multiple purposes (sermon prep, academic study, lay reading).

Weaknesses / Critiques (Fair Read)

  • Reception in academic philosophy: While highly cited in philosophy of religion, some critics say his work doesn’t always engage the full depth of current metaphysical or epistemological debate (especially compared to specialist secular metaphysicians).
  • Heavy on formal argumentation: Some find his style more analytic/logical than narrative or pastoral; for some church-audiences this may feel abstract.
  • Polarizing among skeptics: As seen in rationalist/atheist critiques (e.g., via RationalWiki) he is often targeted for alleged oversimplifications of opponents’ positions. (RationalWiki)
  • Scope of expertise: While very strong in certain domains (cosmology, resurrection, time), he may less often engage adjacent fields in apologetics (e.g., detailed biblical-textual criticism, social science of religion) in the public-facing materials.

Leave a Reply

Scroll to Top

Discover more from Smith For Christ Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading