Richard Dawkins vs. Christian Philosophers: A Comparative Analysis


🧩 Richard Dawkins vs. Christian Philosophers: A Comparative Analysis


1️⃣ “Philosophy Is Obsolete—Science Explains Everything”

Dawkins’ claim.
Dawkins frequently dismisses philosophy as outdated, asserting that only empirical science yields genuine knowledge (Dawkins, 2006).

“Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.” (Dawkins, 2006, p. 283)

Christian philosophical response.
Plantinga (2011) contends that Dawkins’ “scientism”—the view that only science produces truth—is self-defeating because that very statement cannot be verified by science. Craig (2008) further argues that scientific investigation presupposes philosophical assumptions such as logic, causality, and the uniformity of nature.

Scripture.
Romans 1:20 – “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made…”


2️⃣ “The God Hypothesis Fails as a Scientific Theory”

Dawkins’ claim.
In The God Delusion, Dawkins treats the existence of God as a scientific hypothesis that should be testable by empirical means (Dawkins, 2006).

“The temptation [to believe in a designer] is a false one, because the designer himself immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer.” (Dawkins, 2006, p. 121)

Christian philosophical response.
Craig (2008) replies that this misrepresents the nature of theism: God is not an object within the universe to be tested but the metaphysical ground of its existence. Plantinga (2011) adds that belief in God is a properly basic belief—rational, though not derived from empirical evidence.

Scripture.
Acts 17:28 – “For in Him we live and move and have our being.”


3️⃣ “Morality Evolved—No God Required”

Dawkins’ claim.
Dawkins describes morality as a by-product of evolution aimed at survival advantage (Dawkins, 1976):

“The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.” (Dawkins, 1995, p. 133)

Christian philosophical response.
Lennox (2011) argues that if moral behavior evolved solely for survival, then morality becomes subjective and collapses into utilitarianism. Craig (2008) maintains that the existence of objective moral values implies a transcendent moral Lawgiver.

Scripture.
Romans 2:15 – “The work of the law [is] written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness.”


4️⃣ “Faith Is Blind Belief Without Evidence”

Dawkins’ claim.

“Faith is belief without evidence and reason; coincidentally that’s also the definition of delusion.” (Dawkins, 2006, p. 348)

Christian philosophical response.
Craig (2008) and Lennox (2011) note that biblical faith (pistis) means “trust based on evidence.” Faith is not opposed to reason but complements it—trust grounded in testimony and historical revelation. Everyone, even the skeptic, exercises faith in certain presuppositions about reason and reality.

Scripture.
Hebrews 11:1 – “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”


5️⃣ “The Universe Can Exist Without God—Physics Explains It All”

Dawkins’ claim.
Following physicists like Lawrence Krauss, Dawkins suggests the universe could arise from quantum fluctuations, making divine creation unnecessary (Dawkins, 2012).

Christian philosophical response.
Craig (2013) and Plantinga (2011) reply that “nothing” in physics still presupposes physical laws—something rather than absolute non-being. Only a transcendent Creator explains why anything exists at all.

Scripture.
Genesis 1:1 – “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”


🏛 Summary Table


🕊 Final Reflection

“The conflict is not between science and faith but between two philosophies: naturalism and theism.” (Lennox, 2011, p. 28)


📚 References (APA 7th Edition)

Craig, W. L. (2008). Reasonable faith: Christian truth and apologetics (3rd ed.). Crossway.

Craig, W. L. (2013). On guard: Defending your faith with reason and precision. David C. Cook.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1995). River out of Eden: A Darwinian view of life. Basic Books.

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Houghton Mifflin.

Dawkins, R. (2012). The magic of reality: How we know what’s really true. Free Press.

Lennox, J. C. (2011). Gunning for God: Why the new atheists are missing the target. Lion Hudson.

Plantinga, A. (2011). Where the conflict really lies: Science, religion, and naturalism. Oxford University Press.

New King James Version. (1982). Holy Bible. Thomas Nelson Publishers.


Leave a Reply

Scroll to Top

Discover more from Smith For Christ Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading